- As far as comparison goes, there isn't much to compare space objects to. I may have insulted intelligence when explaining what the sun and moon were, but it seemed fine otherwise.
Voice
- When it comes to diction and clarity, I'm surprisingly audible (I'm usually too quiet) and use language that the audience would be expected to understand. I didn't use very many, if any, fillers in the presentation, though I did have a small giggle-fit that I shouldn't have had.
Body Language
- I commanded attention by being a little bit more animated, using my hands to illustrate certain aspects such as the tail of a comet or how Pluto and its moon are the same size. I tend to stand more in the invisible box, though I do move a little bit. It's a tight squeeze in there. I made an adequate amount of eye contact, though I may have been a little too fidgety.
Preparedness
- I took a paper up with me that listed a bunch of key points, and I refered to them when I wasn't sure where to go next. Luckily I put enough of the things about space that I knew for it to work out. I did search the list one or two times, but overall I picked out points pretty quickly.
Overall Effectiveness
- I was rather interesting simply because of my diction and casual tone of voice. It was easier to connect to such a casual tone than someone sputtering out scientific facts about bathtubs or crayons. If I could go back and do it again, I would better prepare myself. I did have a good list, but having a better idea of what to say may save me from another giggle-fit. I'd also try to break out of the box in order to seem more interesting.
